Showing posts with label FDIC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FDIC. Show all posts

Senator Shelby is Worse Than Hoover


Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama has proven that he is criminally ill-informed and/or insane. On "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos, he said he wanted to force banks to just close down. Not nationalize them through FDIC receivership, just close them. I'm shocked that his statement has not received more coverage. His plan is not just crazy, it is also potentially illegal.

There is an argument to treat big banks the same way we treat small banks, but there is no logic to what Senator Shelby is advocating. Banks don't just close in the United States. They can't just close. If they are insolvent, the FDIC takes them over-- i.e., nationalizes them, and sells off their assets to recover funds for depositors and creditors. Temporary nationalization is how we “bury the small banks.”

By law the federal government insures up to $250,000 of an individual's deposits. You can't just allow a bank to close, wiping out millions of bank accounts. At the very least, they need to be nationalized long enough to allow millions of average Americans get their money out.

Senator Shelby's remarks are so out of the mainstream it is impossible to tell if he is just horribly ill-informed or if he is advocating an insane form of economic nihilism. Does he not know that when banks fail they are nationalized by the FDIC? If he does, is he then advocating eliminating the FDIC and FDIC insurance? What does “close them down” even mean? Would people wake up one morning and find every branch of Citibank permanently shuttered? If that is the case, the result would be a disastrous great depression-style run on the banks. The media should not allow an individual with Senator Shelby's power to make such potentially destructive statements without a complete explanation.

Would Nationalize By Any Other Name Not Sound So Scary?


Never have I seen an idea move so quickly from the fringe to the mainstream. While three months ago only a few people were even discussing the possibility of nationalizing some of the failed banks, it is now getting serious coverage. Some Republican lawmakers and publications like the Economist and Newsweek have started to openly talk about the possibility.

The fact that at least a few of the worst banks will be nationalized now seems inevitable. Already some banks have received more TARP money than they are now worth. President Obama has even acknowledged that Sweden's nationalization of their banks in the 90's is so far the best model for how to deal with the problem.

It seems that the greatest obstacle to nationalizing the banks is the term nationalization. For decades, the right has turned both socialism and nationalization into four letter words in American politics. This means that Obama's most important objective in dealing with bank crisis is to invent a new name for nationalization. Below is a list of my favorites. Do not be surprised to see one of these names (or something similar) picked up by the White House in the coming weeks:

Structured Bankruptcy
Managed Bankruptcy
Managed Restructuring
Receivership
FDIC Takeover
Temporary FDIC Directorship
Temporary FDIC Management
FDIC Directed Reorganization
FDIC Restructuring
Reorganization
Managed Reorganization
Forced Reorganization
Managed Liquidation
Directed Management Reorganization

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...